🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Movement

In Europe, a growing number of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to approve a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," said one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily occurring at the state level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills mandating guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to copy this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other nations are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of Australia and its followers show that governments around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.